Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1889/5078
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorModena, Elisabetta-
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-03T13:21:10Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-03T13:21:10Z-
dc.date.issued2022-10-
dc.identifier.issn2038-8411-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1889/5078-
dc.description.abstractIn recent years we have been witnessing the realisation of artistic projects that were conceived in a specific situation, not realised and then produced in other contexts, in some cases even by different people. These are not practices of reenactment, i.e. the repetition of a work executed in the past, nor even a Plan B developed by the artist, but the enactment of projects that come to light for the first time in a context subsequent to the one in which they were conceived. In this essay, I propose defining these practices with the term post-enactment, identifying why we will increasingly be seeing projects of this kind, and suggesting a possible taxonomy. One of the aims is to enhance awareness of the state of progress of the artwork project, the contingencies in which it is produced, and the artist's intentions: a series of considerations useful for the valorization of the artist's work and the project as a critical method, rather than only as a work in a state of potentiality.en_US
dc.language.isoIngleseen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titlePost-enactment. Realising the unrealised work of arten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.licenseAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internazionale*
Appears in Collections:2022, Dossier 7. The lockdown of the projects

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
MODENA-post.pdfeditorial version1.29 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons