Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1889/4844
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorBelletti, Beatrice-
dc.contributor.authorRavasini, Simone-
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-20T15:24:28Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-20T15:24:28Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1889/4844-
dc.description.abstractAll types of buildings may be subjected during their service life to extreme events such as earthquakes, tsunamis, explosions, fires or even terrorist attacks. The engineering community began to face with the structural robustness and progressive collapse topic in the last decades, after the Ronan Point apartments collapse in 1968, the Murrah Federal Building bombing in Oklahoma City in 1995 and especially after the World Trade Center terroristic attack in 2001, New York. Current codes and guidelines employ two different strategies to be considered for accidental design situations: (i) strategies based on identified accidental actions for example impacts or explosions and (ii) strategies based on unidentified accidental actions based on limiting the extent of a localized failure. For these latter, the following methods are provided to assess the structural robustness of structures against accidental action and extreme events: (i) the Tie Force, (ii) the Alternate Load Path and (iii) the Key Element methods. In the years, experimental, analytical and numerical techniques were developed, especially aimed to investigate the behaviour of reinforced concrete (RC) monolithic and steel assemblies with very scarce attention to masonry and precast concrete (PC) systems. Nowadays, experimental, numerical and analytical methods are needed to investigate the behaviour of precast concrete structures to fill the gap of the lack of knowledge on progressive collapse performance of such structural typology. To this aim, in this work, numerical techniques and an analytical method are proposed for the structural robustness assessment of PC structures based on the current experimental tests observations and current guidelines requirements available for PC systems under accidental actions. The progressive collapse phenomenon is simulated considering the resisting mechanisms which may develop in connections and members to resist accidental action (i.e. flexural and catenary stages) based on the resistance and ductility of connections. Nonlinear static and dynamic responses are investigated and a simplified analytical assessment framework is proposed. Both modelling technique and analytical method are demonstrated suitable and reasonably accurate for the assessment of structural robustness of precast concrete systems composed by beams and column members and hollow-core floor units. Design suggestions and detailing solutions are finally discussed for practical engineering purposes aimed to design and verify the structural robustness of precast concrete systems.en_US
dc.language.isoIngleseen_US
dc.publisherUniversità degli studi di Parma. Dipartimento di Ingegneria e architetturaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDottorato di ricerca in Ingegneria civile e architetturaen_US
dc.rights© Simone Ravasini, 2022en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internazionaleen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectStructural robustnessen_US
dc.subjectPrecast concrete structuresen_US
dc.subjectNonlinear finite element analysesen_US
dc.subjectSimplified analytical approachen_US
dc.subjectNonlinear staticen_US
dc.subjectNonlinear dynamicen_US
dc.subjectDesign procedureen_US
dc.titleStructural robustness assessment of precast concrete structuresen_US
dc.typeDoctoral thesisen_US
dc.subject.miurICAR/09en_US
Appears in Collections:Ingegneria civile, dell'Ambiente, del Territorio e Architettura. Tesi di dottorato

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Relazione_finale_Ravasini_34ciclo.pdf
  Restricted Access
6.6 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy
Tesi_Ravasini_34_ciclo_final_Revised.pdf
  Until 2024-06-01
22.44 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons